Micro 4 3 Sensor Size Comparison

Considering all of them are.

Micro 4 3 sensor size comparison.

I wouldn t recommend a micro 4 3 if you are looking for a high quality performing camera. For the comparison they took those 12 shots three per camera and fixed the exposure in post to see how much information each sensor was able to retain in both over and under exposed areas. Zeus if you have had the benefit of a full frame sensor it s doubtful you will be happy with low light performance below the aps c sensor size. This illustration compares digital camera sensor sizes.

It is around 9 times larger than the 1 2 3 sensors typically used in compact digital cameras. Initially i expected that the aps c sensor would perform better but it fell short. Below compare sensor sizes for digital cameras. We compare 4 sensor sizes to see how they compare in print image quality.

Special thanks to our friends at lensprotogo and datacolor for helping us make this comparison possible. Now if i were to say get a 1inch with 400mm micro 4 3 with a 300mm or an aps c with a 400 500mm. And secondly if the micro four thirds olympus can produce large prints equal to that of a full frame sensor at half the price is there really any need to spend more than 2 000 on a body. Hasselblad x1d ii 50c sony a7r iv sony a6600 and panasonic gh5.

I have a nikon dslr and it blows the low light performance of my micro 4 3 camera out of the water even using similarly slow glass. See how much difference there is in the medium full frame aps c and micro 4 3 sensors. Full frame 35mm which is actually 36mm wide aps c micro four thirds 1 inch 1 1 7 and 1 2 5 type. The image sensor of four thirds and mft measures 18 mm 13 5 mm 22 5 mm diagonal with an imaging area of 17 3 mm 13 0 mm 21 6 mm diagonal comparable to the frame size of 110 film.

In fact as shown on the left the difference is even smaller than the difference between full size and aps c and the micro four thirds sensor is massive compared to popular compact camera sensors.