Minimally Invasive Hip Replacement Pros And Cons

The surrounding soft tissue is separated to allow access and visibility of the hip joint.

Minimally invasive hip replacement pros and cons.

In my last blog post i discussed minimally invasive surgery with regard to hip replacement. While new techniques instruments and prostheses have been developed specifically for minimally invasive surgeries there are many well established approaches to hip replacement. Direct superior approach. The hope is that patients who undergo this minimally invasive hip replacement will have shorter hospital stays quicker rehabilitation and better results.

Experts advise patients who are considering minimally invasive hip replacement to educate themselves on the pros and cons of the operation and choose their surgeons carefully. However being a new surgery there are questions as to whether or not this is actually a better procedure. A hip replacement may be done for various reasons. Research on minimally invasive hip replacement surgery is mixed and it is not clear whether it has an advantage over traditional hip replacement surgery.

When performing a hip replacement your surgeon can get to the hip joint from the front from the side or from the back. The goals of minimally invasive hip replacement surgery are to perform the operation with a smaller incision and less trauma to the deep tissues to reduce postoperative discomfort and to speed discharge from the hospital. Certain conditions can damage the hip joint and result in needing to have the joint replaced the two most common conditions being rheumatoid. Less damage to major muscles the anterior approach avoids cutting major muscles.

There are pros and cons to traditional hip replacement when compared with minimally invasive hip replacement. Proponents of the two incision technique of hip replacement argue. According to the centers for disease control and prevention cdc over 320 000 hip replacements were done. In the meantime people considering hip replacement surgery and their surgeons must make decisions.

The direct superior approach has been developed as a minimally invasive technique to enter the hip joint without causing damage to some key muscle groups. The direct superior approach is a surgical technique to gain access to the hip joint. Proponents of anterior hip replacement surgery believe it offers several advantages including. Other names for the procedure are minimally invasive or muscle sparing hip arthroplasty.

This article is designed to give you a comprehensive review of what minimally invasive hip replacement surgery is all about. The bullet points below summarize much of what we know about the pros and cons of anterior hip replacement surgery.